Posts Tagged school systems
Character Education: What Counselor Educators Need To Know.
Introduction Character education is the “fastest growing reform movement in P-12 education today” (Williams, 2000, p. 32), thus all counselor educators and counseling students need to be informed and cognizant of various P-12 character education programs. Currently, more than 30 states mandate some aspect of character education (Otten, 2000) and school counselors are frequently responsible for introducing character education curricula to their schools. However, research suggests that counselor education programs are not emphasizing character education in their preparation programs (Ryan & Bohlin, 1999). DEFINITIONS AND APPROACHESWhat is character education and how does it affect education? Williams & Schnaps (1999) detail the work of the now defunct National Commission on Character Education, formed in 1997, to answer these questions. The Commission defined the term character education as “any deliberate approach by which school personnel, often in conjunction with parents and community members, help children and youth become caring, principled and responsible” (Williams & Schnaps, 1999). According to Williams (2000), the Commission used character education as an umbrella term that encompasses diverse approaches, philosophies and programs. Problem solving, decision-making,and conflict resolution are important aspects of developing moral character. Character education offers students opportunities to experience these traits directly. Typically, the goals of character education are to help children become morally responsible, self-disciplined citizens (McBrien & Brandt, 1997).
The American School Counselor Association stated that the purpose of character education is to “assist students in becoming positive and self-directed in their lives and education and in striving toward future goals” (ASCA, 1998). These goals are carried out by teaching children about basic human values such as honesty, kindness, generosity, courage, freedom, equality, and respect (McBrien & Brandt, 1997). TYPES OF PROGRAMSNumerous types of character education programs exist. Williams and Schnaps (1999) provided a thorough description of five major theoretical perspectives of character education: Watson’s community of caring (1989); DeVries’s constructive approach (1998); Berkowitz’s child development perspective (1985, 1999); Lickona’s eclectic approach (Lickona, 1991); and Ryan’s traditional approach (Ryan, 1995). In a later study, Williams (2000) delineated four commonalities among the five theories. First, each theory involves direct instruction wherein youth are inculcated with virtues of society through training on habits or virtuous behavior (including Ryan [1995], Lickona [1991], and Berkowitz [1985]). Second, indirect instruction is a common component of character education. Williams and Schnaps (1999, p. 12) defined indirect instruction as “building a child’s understanding which is believed to lead to interpersonal interactions of peers under the guidance of caring adults.” Williams and Schnaps (1999) cited theorists DeVries, Lickona, Watson, and Berkowitz as participating in indirect instruction. Third, theorists Watson (1989) and Berkowitz (1999) included community building in their theories. Community building enhances moral character through caring relationships and environments. Fourth, all character education theories utilized adults as role models.
Tags: adult, american school, children, curriculum, design, e learning, education, education and, education curriculum, educator, instruction, learning, mental health, parents, professional school, program, programs, quality, research, school, school curriculum, school system, school systems, schools, strategy, student, students, study, teach, teacher, teachers, teaching, the school, theory, trainingRelated posts
An open letter to President Obama on schools, education and teaching
Dear Mr. President,
I am writing to you as a National Board Certified Social Studies Teacher who voted for your as President even despite my concerns about your approach to educational policy. You were not my first choice, precisely because I, like many educators I know, were concerned both about your approach to some educational issues and some of the people advising you. Nevertheless, we all enthusiastically supported your candidacy, in many cases before you clinched the nomination.
I will not speak for anyone except myself. Others are also writing open letters, as you can see at this website.
Tags: american school, american schools, certification, charter school, charter schools, children, college, course, courses, department of education, design, e learning, education, education and, education department, educational, educator, essay, essays, high school, instruction, international education, learning, no child left behind, of education, parents, physical education, private school, private schools, professional development, program, programs, public education, public school, public school system, public schools, quality, research, scale, school, school board, school system, school systems, school teacher, schooling, schools, score, scores, secretary of education, special, staff development, student, students, teach, teacher, teachers, teaching, teaching and learning, the school, thinking skills, website, writingRelated posts
On the uses and misuses of Advanced Placement – a personal reflection
I teach 3 sections of Advanced Placement US Government and Politics, mainly to 10th graders. I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, it gives me access to some of the brightest students in our school, students who stretch me as a teacher. On the other hand, I have the responsibility of preparing them for the Advanced Placement test, which determines whether or not they will receive college credit. While this is a semester college-level course spread out over a year, I am more than a little restricted because of the necessity of preparing them to sit for the test.
There are two recent “events” which lead to my writing this posting. The first was serving as a Reader (grader) for the AP exam for the course I teach. The second was the concurrent release of Jay Mathews’ Challenge Index, which uses a ratio of number of advanced placement tests taken divided by number of graduating seniors to create a ranking. The combination of these two events has lead to my seriously thinking about the impact of Advanced Placement in our public schools, and thus to the writing of this post.
Tags: average score, children, college, colleges, colleges and universities, course, courses, design, education, educator, essay, essays, for college, for students, high school, high schools, higher education, instruction, learning, of education, parents, program, public school, public schools, quality, research, scale, school, school system, school systems, schools, science, score, scores, special, student, students, teach, teacher, teachers, teaching, the school, theory, training, universities, university, writingRelated posts